Skip to main content
All CollectionsSearch Filters
How To Get The Most Amount Of Leads In Your ListKit Searches
How To Get The Most Amount Of Leads In Your ListKit Searches

Order more ListKit leads in 2 clicks with our "Re-Order" feature

Bourhan Sbalbal avatar
Written by Bourhan Sbalbal
Updated over a week ago

If you've exported a list from ListKit and want more leads from the same search, this article will show you how!

Let's say you ordered 3k leads from a search of 10k contacts, and you want to go back in and export more leads from the remaining 7k contacts.

What you can do is:

Reorder The List

Reorder Your List with "Exclude All".

If you go to your order history, select the search you want to re-order from and select the blue "Re-order" button.

Make sure you select the "Exclude All" option, and ListKit will target the remaining 7,000 leads for your next export without including any duplicates.

Addressing the 'People Per Company' Count

A low 'People Per Company' count can significantly impact your search results. For instance, if you set a limit of only 1 person per company, the list may be smaller than you anticipate.

If you expand your search to 5 people per company, there's a much greater chance at getting a full list of leads for your next campaign.

Plus, we recommend targeting multiple contacts at the same company... There's a much greater chance your email will get seen and responded to!

Order The Full List

This is pretty self-explanatory, but if you want to maximize your search, order the maximum amount of leads based on the search you built.

For example, if you built a search with 10k leads, export all 10k leads at once with at least 5 people per company to maximize your results! (Self explanatory, but a necessary point to make)

Need Further Guidance? We're Here to Assist!

If you have questions or encounter challenges with ListKit, our dedicated support team is here to help. Reach out to us via Intercom, and we'll provide the assistance you need to optimize your lead acquisition efforts effectively.

Did this answer your question?